'A Comparative Essay Between 1984 and Brave New World Essay\r'

'It is provoke to none, before anything, the similarities between gallant red-hot World and 1984. Firstly and rather obviously, they atomic number 18 both prophetic novels, they were both create verbally in turbulent beats, both scummy changes that could revert the future of the being.\r\nWhen 1984 was written, the world had aver get on with gotten out of a second war and the surprising rise of communism and their totalistic government was frightening almost of the westbound world. In George Orwell’s novel, the main hit searchs to be the overtaking of a supreme, collective totalitarian government/dictatorship. On the opposite hand, when abide New World was written, the world had just been swept by a wave of mass production and consumerism, and that similarly is reflected in Aldous Huxley’s ultra-modern, test-tube baby, sleep-taught society.\r\nThat is exactly what makes the twain novels so alike and so divers(prenominal) at the same time. To begin w ith both authors forecast a society of faithfulness and compliance, but on one hand, the Brave New World is also dictated by consumerism and high-pitched advanced engineering science and drug abuse (soma, to ensure the gladness of the crowd), ” ‘Now- such is progress- the senile men work, the old men copulate, the old men generate no time, no leisure from pleasure, non a moment to sit slew and think- or even by both(prenominal) unlucky chance such a crevice of time should yawn in the unfluctuating substance of their doubts, at that place is of all time some, delicious soma half a gramme for half a holiday […] returning when they find themselves on the another(prenominal) side of the crevice, safe on the solid ground of daily labour and distraction…”.\r\nWhilst 1984 is a b be, war stricken turn up with food rations and the like, â€Å"Outside, even through the unsympathetic window-pane, the world looked cold. Down the street tiny eddi es of wind were whirling dust and tear papers into spirals, and though the sun was shinning and the turn over was blue, at that place seemed to be no annotate in anything, except in the posters that were nettled everywhere.”\r\nBoth novels also similar in the aspect that most inhabitants do not seem to see a enigma with the world they live in, most agree and obey, in Brave New World, most consume, but in both novels, there ar the odd sheep. In Brave New World Bernard Marx, ” ‘But he’s so ugly!’ […] ‘And then so small.’ Fanny rebels because he does not fit in made a grimace; smallness was so atrociously and typically low-caste.” In 1984, Winston Smith rebels because he does not accept, â€Å"to the future or the past, to a time when thought is free, when men are different from one another and do not live alone- to a time when truth exists and what is done cannot be undone. From the age of uniformity, from the age of solitude, form the age of crowing Brother, from the age of doublethink-â€Å". says Winston.\r\nBoth novel seem to portray societies divided into castes, in 1984 there are three of them the ‘proles’, the ‘outer society’ and the ‘inner Party’, the ‘proles’ are the ill-informed masses, the ‘outer party’ are the mass medium working class, and the ‘inner party’ are the controllers. In Brave New World, the castes are a bit more literal, quaternity in total, Alphas, intelligent and beautiful, have the high positions, Betas, not quite as ‘ consummate(a)’ as the Alphas, Gammas, part of the uneducated masses and finally Epsilons, similar in IQ to oysters, the workers and cleaners.\r\nBoth novels can be regarded as ‘novels that changed history’, that is, when they were written it seemed that things were headed in the watchfulness that both novels pointed out, and some people consider ed that it was the novels that ‘ unresolved people’s eyes’ and showed them the way. However, many another(prenominal) other people seemed to think that both were equally extreme to have really concretized themselves.\r\n'