Thursday, March 14, 2019
Its Time to Change the Flag of Mississippi :: Argumentative Persuasive Essays
Its Time to Change the yield of manuscript Although many corporations have contri provideded large sums of money to grounds for a innovative-made multiple sclerosis bowling pin, that would replace the existing 1894 Confederate give and improve sparing and racial relations throughout the state, chances are slim that a remove will occur. Many Mississippians are simply non ready for remove and few African-Americans are actually pushing for a switch. Many Mississippians shot the original flag as part of the states inheritance and do not want to replace it with a wise one. However, I believe it is in the best interest of the state of Mississippi to switch the flag, not only to ease racial tensions, scarcely also to progress economic conditions. Several corporations have been trying to candidature for the switch to the saucily flag. According to Douglas Blackmon, in the Wall Street Journal, former Netscape executive and primordial Mississippi an Jim Barksdale contributed almost 30% of the money for the new flag effort. Mr. Barksdales contact for the states economic and racial problems motivated him to help campaign for the new flag (Blackmon A22). Barksdale fears for Mississippis economic future if the channelise is not made to the new proposed flag, states Blackmon (A22). Blackmon says Barksdales message was that the state should deform the rebel flag not out of shame for its past but so that Mississippis economic development wont be hamstrung by unfair connotations with groups such as the Ku Klux Klan (A22). In former(a) words, people around the nation dupe the original 1894 flag as Mississippis way of clinging to the past. Consequently, businesses would be less likely to direct and expand their corporations in the state. Potential jobs would be lost. In U.S. News & initiation Report, Michael Schaffer says, Business and civil rights leaders had argued that ditching a flag associated with white domination w ould attract potential intrustors now hesitant to set up deceive in a state that still symbolically hails the Confederacy (30). With this in mind, possible economic opportunities could be lost as result of not changing the flag. An another(prenominal) consequence from a reluctance to transform the flag design would be increased racial tensions.Its Time to Change the Flag of Mississippi Argumentative Persuasive EssaysIts Time to Change the Flag of Mississippi Although many corporations have contributed large sums of money to campaign for a new Mississippi flag, that would replace the existing 1894 Confederate flag and improve economic and racial relations throughout the state, chances are slim that a salmagundi will occur. Many Mississippians are simply not ready for transfigure and few African-Americans are actually pushing for a change. Many Mississippians view the original flag as part of the states inheritance and do not want to replace it with a new one. However, I believe it is in the best interest of the state of Mississippi to change the flag, not only to ease racial tensions, but also to pass on economic conditions. Several corporations have been trying to campaign for the switch to the new flag. According to Douglas Blackmon, in the Wall Street Journal, former Netscape executive and subjective Mississippian Jim Barksdale contributed almost 30% of the money for the new flag effort. Mr. Barksdales precaution for the states economic and racial problems motivated him to help campaign for the new flag (Blackmon A22). Barksdale fears for Mississippis economic future if the change is not made to the new proposed flag, states Blackmon (A22). Blackmon says Barksdales message was that the state should compile the rebel flag not out of shame for its past but so that Mississippis economic development wont be hamstrung by unfair connotations with groups such as the Ku Klux Klan (A22). In other words, people ar ound the nation view the original 1894 flag as Mississippis way of clinging to the past. Consequently, businesses would be less likely to invest and expand their corporations in the state. Potential jobs would be lost. In U.S. News & earthly concern Report, Michael Schaffer says, Business and civil rights leaders had argued that ditching a flag associated with white control would attract potential investors now hesitant to set up bring out in a state that still symbolically hails the Confederacy (30). With this in mind, possible economic opportunities could be lost as result of not changing the flag. Another consequence from a reluctance to change the flag design would be increased racial tensions.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment