Changing Concentration of Hydrochloric Acid

Changing Concentration of Hydrochloric AcidHow ordain changing the concentration of hydrochloric (HCl) dosage affect the come in of hydrogen boast (H2) production during the chemical reaction with magnesium (Mg), using the pressure word formup by hydrogen gas?IntroductionFactors that influence arranges of reactions include swap in concentration, temperature, surface ara, or the addition of a catalyst. This experiment will specifically investigate the government issue of concentration swop of the reactants upon the graze of reaction, using hydrochloric acid and magnesium pull down. The concentration of HCl acid resoluteness is controlled through serial dilution.2HCl(aq) + Mg(s) MgCl2(aq) + H2(g)This experiment in particular will explore how the pressure changes as the above reaction proceeds. Because the reaction produces hydrogen gas as a product, building up more than pressure within the confined space of a screen tube, a pressure demodulator will measure the rate of reaction. After the reaction begins, approximately 20 seconds of selective information will be collected with individually trial, in order to formulate a common slip (a graph of pressure over time). With average slopes of divers(prenominal) amount of concentrations, a gunstockar regression line will then be created to sketch the trend, regarding the effect of concentration upon pressure-the rate of reaction.HypothesisAccording to impact Theory, the reactant particles mustiness collide together, and thus creating a reaction. Because increasing the concentration of HCl acid outcome also center an improver in the number of hydrogen and chloride ions, collision between the reactant particles increases as well, resulting in more products-hydrogen gas. With more production of hydrogen gas in the confined quiz tube, pressure will build up.Therefore, if-at a given period of time-the concentration of HCl acid radical increases, then the rate of reaction will increase according ly, because more collisions will occur, producing hydrogen gas at a higher rate.VariablesVariable description mode of measuring variableDependent variablePressure buildup due to the reaction between hydrochloric acid solution and magnesiumDuring the reaction, H2gas is produced, thus increasing the volume within the confined space of a test tube and increasing the pressure. This change will be recorded by a pressure sensor. Collecting data for closely 10 seconds before the injection of the magnesium strip, the measurement of pressure will continue for about 20 seconds after the reaction begins. Three trials are required for each concentration of HCl solution to diminish random error.Rate of reactionUsing the more accurate initial rate of the reaction, about 10 seconds of the graph after the reaction begins will be used to create a slope of change in pressure over time.Independent variableConcentration of HCl solutionUsing serial dilution on with apparatus such as micropipette and flask, the 1M hydrochloric acid solution will be diluted into 0.5M, 0.25M, 0.125M, and 0.0625M.Controlled variablesMg strip (length)Using a ruler and scissor, the Mg strip will be cut into 15 pieces, each being 1cm.Volume of hydrochloric acid solutionFor each concentration, 3cm3of hydrochloric acid solution is used, accurately measured by a pipette.Temperature of reactantsThe temperature remains constant at room temperature (approx. 25 degrees Celsius) throughout the entire experiment.Shaking of the test tubeTo create the most accurate results possible, physical motion when slightly shaking the test tubes must be repetitive in the same way for each trial.Size of the test tubeBecause varied sizes of test tubes would mean different volumes as well, constant size (volume) is essential, preferably small so that the reaction will be more conspicuous. To do this, 15 identical test tubes are used.Table 1 List of VariablesApparatus and Materials1M hydrochloric acid solutionDistilled water Magnesium stripFlask (50cm3)Pressure sensorLogger ProMicropipette15 identical test tubesSandpaperScissorProcedurePut 20cm3 of 1M HCL solution in the flask and dilute it to 0.5M with 20cm3 of distilled water.Using the serial dilution as in step 1, pay back 10cm3 solutions with concentrations of 1M, 0.5M, 0.25M, 0.125M, and 0.0625M. attention deficit hyperactivity disorder 3 cm3 of each solution into labeled test tubes using the micropipette. reiterate step 3 to prepare three test tubes of each solution (15 in total)Cut out the magnesium strip into 15 pieces of 1cm and sand them with sandpaper.Put the cut out magnesium strip into the test tube with 1M HCl solution.Then apace cover the test tube with the pressure sensor.Start collecting data while shaking the test tube in a consistent manner for about 25 seconds after the reaction begins.Repeat steps 6 to 8 for all other test tubes. entropy Collection and Processing soft DataAfter the injection of the magnesium strip into the HCl sol ution, it effervesces and pressure inside the test tube begins to build up.With test tubes of higher concentration, the pressure seems to be higher within the time limit and more bubbles form.At the end of the reaction, the solutions color changed to transparent yellow.The reacted solution (product) gives off a foul smell.Processed DataData Presentation1 0.5 0.25 0.125 0.0625UncertaintiesStandard DeviationStandard deviation was calculated and represented in the rate of reaction vs. concentration graph as error bars.Standard deviation for different concentration of HCl solutionStandard deviation was calculated by a graphing calculator. scruple due to the serial dilution of HCl solutionUncertainty due to 1cm3Uncertainty during dilution measuring pressure (?)ConclusionIn Figure 1, the trend of different concentrations of reactants influencing the rate of reaction is illustrated. The linear regression line demonstrates the clear change in rate of reaction, according to the change in co ncentration-the lower the concentration, the slower the rate of reaction. Hence, the initial hypothesis, stating the direct relationship between concentration and rate of reaction, is justified and validated.EvaluationShown by Table 4, in which the standard deviations for each concentration of HCl solution are calculated, the results of this experiment are fairly precise, but not to a great extent. muchover, uncertainties created during the preparation of the experiment, as with the focussing of apparatus and materials such as the gas pressure sensor, flask, and micropipette decreases the accuracy. Although Figure 1, the graph containing the general trend of concentrations effect upon the rate of reaction seems to validate the hypothesis, the rate of reaction of 0.25M HCl solution stands out of the trend, decreasing the validity of this experiments results.More factors that may have hindered obtaining accurate results of this experiment includeErrorImpactImprovementsUsing hand to bump around the test tubes for faster reaction rateAny non-perceptible (by humans) changes influenced each reaction to proceed differently, ultimately creating different band for each trial. This change in circumstances is crucial since it greatly hinders accurate results.The use of a vibration plate instead may reduce error as it is more consistent. Reproducible circumstances can be better achieved.