How Much Land Does a Man Need Essay

Realism, as the discourse implies, deals with currentity as its subject, that is, putting fury on what is happening in the real world, preferably than stressing emotions as a opening of aesthetic experience. In literature, it lots focuses on moral or ethical choices much(prenominal) that it gives emphasis on the actions by the characters rather than the actual plot of the fiction. Characters be alike portrayed with motive, more often than non, in congenator to the view of their social class. In realness, sensational and dramatic elements that are often found in naturalism and ro firearmces are avoided.The short stories The Bet and How Much shore Does a Man Need? are examples of literature in the style of realism which focuses on the ethical choices of the characters in relation to their social class. The Bet focuses on the squareity of the world. It gave contrasts to the materialistic world view of the banker, and the relief of the young man in the story. Although the irresolution at the beginning is whether or non the closing penalty is worse than living imprisonment, the story has not given an practise to it (it was not its intention to answer this anyway), tho rather, it presented views of morality.It altogether despises materiality. The young man at the end of the story proclaimed It is every last(predicate) worthless, fleeting, illusory, and deceptive, like a mirage I respond at you who exchange heaven for earth. I dont want to scan you (Chekrov). Like The Bet, How Much reduce Does a Man Need? criticizes the human experience of materiality. The story, however, shifts its focus on covetousness. It differs with The Bet in the sense that while How Much Land Does a Man Need? does not necessarily condemn acquiring material possession in this world, it presented a forefront of how much of this material possession does man really need. Pahom, the main character in the story, was given the opportunity to acquire destroy of his own , but was overcome by greed many times throughout the story. In the end, this greed was the cause of his death. The moral of the story is that man should only take what is incumbent for living, nothing in excess. The story likewise implies that man cannot take in death what man possess in life. working CitedChekrov, Anton. The Bet Tolstoy, Leo. How Much Land Does a Man Need