No Shirt, No Shoes, No Service :: essays research papers

No Shoes, No Shirt, No ServiceFor the past few months, I have been focusing on the events and the principles behind the founding of our nation. During these studies, I often wondered how some of the ideas we cling to became fasten in our paradigms of perception. For instance, there are words that have become tabu because of the ways they have been used. They are so taboo, in fact, that it has become near impossible to use the words constructively, because using them either shuts off the apparatus in the brain that controls attention span, or their mentioning automatically invites a defensive attitude posture. Two of the unwitting victims are the words "politics" and "discrimination." The demise of reasonable uses of these words is sadly apparent when we discuss the issue of "free trade in" with China. First, since negotiations with foreign politicss can only justly and efficiently be do through representation of our own government, the issue inherently involves politics. There is no way of getting around it. Second, the decision is really whether or non to discriminate against the Chinese government fundamentally on the basis that we do non agree with their methods of controlling internal civil affairs. Are we even up to presume we have the authority to judge the actions of a foreign government when our own government has, in fact, from time to time, been guilty of many of the alike things we accuse the Chinese government of doing? One might be prepared to profess that we have no authority to judge, lest we open up the contingency of allowing ourselves to be judged. However, if we are just and consistent, is thatDickens 2such a terrible proposition? While America is proud of its diversity, that diversity should not be used to steal our attention from the common, unifying principles, which sets America away from the rest of the world. They are the principles outlined in the Declaration of Independence. Without those princip les, we have no claim to freedom, so Im not certain why there is an lying-in to categorically reject them. Retail establishments are apt to decide with whom they lead do business based on criteria that is not necessarily applicable to a persons quality or depth of character. Patrons must be corroding certain articles of clothing, or they are not admitted. No shirt, no shoes, no service. Many of the more highly rated restaurants even require a application and tie for their customers.